77% believe AI coaching can be applied to L&D at every level of the organisation.
More than 50% would like to see AI used in their learning, data and reporting.
Over a third consider AI essential in unlocking the potential of coaching.
Leading through change during restructuring means actively managing how people think, decide, and act as the organisation transitions. It goes beyond communicating new structures or strategies, it requires leaders to create clarity, reinforce priorities, and guide teams through uncertainty while maintaining execution.
In practice, this involves helping individuals translate high-level change into day-to-day behaviours: what to focus on, how decisions are made, and how success is defined in the new environment. Organisations that lead through change effectively are able to stabilise faster, reduce disruption, and return to business-as-usual performance more quickly.
The change curve in the workplace describes the predictable pattern of human and organisational response to disruption. During restructuring, employees and leaders typically move through phases of uncertainty, reduced clarity, and lower performance before adapting and stabilising.
This pattern is often visualised as a dip in productivity and engagement over time. As roles, priorities, and decision rights shift, performance declines before gradually recovering as new behaviours and ways of working take hold.
Understanding this curve helps organisations anticipate challenges rather than react to them and recognise that the dip is not failure, but a natural phase of transformation.
The change curve is critical because it reframes restructuring as a performance recovery challenge, not just an organisational redesign. While disruption is inevitable, the duration and depth of the dip determine the true business impact.
Research on downsizing shows that uncertainty can significantly reduce confidence, commitment, and execution, particularly when employees lack clarity or support.
Organisations that fail to manage the change curve effectively often experience prolonged productivity loss, delayed decision-making, and disengagement. Those that actively manage it can shorten recovery time, reduce the severity of the dip, and accelerate return to full performance.
Leading people through change requires leaders to provide stability in an unstable environment. This means clarifying priorities, reinforcing decision-making frameworks, and helping teams focus on what matters most as conditions shift.
Effective leaders also address the human side of change including emotional load, uncertainty, and cognitive overload which directly impact performance. They create alignment by translating strategy into actionable behaviours and ensuring consistency in how teams operate.
The change curve model is a framework used to understand how individuals and teams respond to disruption over time. It helps organisations map the transition from initial disruption, through adaptation, to eventual stabilization.
In practice, organisations use the change curve model to:
Rather than viewing change as a one-time event, the model positions it as a dynamic process that must be actively managed. This allows leaders to intervene early, reduce friction, and guide teams through the curve more effectively.
Organisations often struggle with leading through change because they focus on structural elements such as org design, communication plans, and processes while underestimating the behavioural and psychological impact of change.
During restructuring, leaders face increased pressure, decision rights become unclear, and teams experience reduced alignment. This leads to slower decision-making, blurred ownership, and a widening gap between strategic intent and actual execution.
Without structured support to reinforce behaviour, organisations can remain stuck in the dip longer than expected, increasing the cost and risk of transformation.
Coaching supports leading through change by equipping leaders and teams with the skills and behaviours needed to perform under uncertainty. This includes strengthening decision-making, building emotional resilience, and maintaining focus amid competing priorities.
Coaching also plays a critical role in translating strategy into action. It helps individuals identify what to start, stop, and sustain ensuring that new ways of working are adopted consistently across the organisation.
By reinforcing behaviour over time, coaching reduces the depth of the change curve, accelerates recovery, and ensures that transformation efforts result in sustained performance improvements.
Organisations shorten the change curve by actively supporting behaviour change at scale. This requires more than one-off interventions, it demands continuous reinforcement, alignment across leadership levels, and integration into daily work.
Behavioural science shows that change only sticks when it is reinforced consistently and over time. Organisations that provide structured, ongoing support such as coaching, are better able to accelerate adaptation, reduce uncertainty, and restore performance faster.
The goal is not to eliminate the dip, but to reduce its duration and severity.
When the change curve is not actively managed, organisations face compounding performance risks. These include slower decision-making, increased coordination costs, declining engagement and prolonged productivity loss.
Over time, teams may revert to old behaviours, momentum fades, and change fatigue increases especially if multiple transformations occur in succession.
Each additional week spent in the dip increases the cost of disruption and delays the realisation of transformation benefits, making recovery slower and less effective.
Success in leading through change is measured by how quickly performance recovers and how effectively new behaviors are embedded across the organisation.
This includes both early signals such as clarity, confidence, and decision-making and longer-term outcomes like engagement, retention, and productivity. Organisations that track both behavioral and business indicators are better able to understand progress, identify risks, and sustain performance beyond the initial recovery phase.
Ultimately, successful restructuring is not defined by the new org chart, but by how quickly people adapt and how consistently they perform in the new environment.
.svg)
